Interview with The Crimson Quarry
It wasn't the most fun season ever for Indiana fans, but the Hoosiers are a deep squad with an abundance of returning stars and much hope for the future. I spoke with The Crimson Quarry's JustAJ about the recently completed season and what lies ahead for IU hoops in November.
BTP: We just finished Tom Crean’s third season in charge of the Hoosiers. Indiana has improved each year under Crean, but still a 3-15 Big Ten mark has to be disappointing. Are fans still willing to wait a couple more years for the program to resurface or is Crean starting to feel some pressure?
CQ: This is an interesting question as it has some layers. At the immediate end of the season there were definitely some rumblings of discontent among a small group of fans, but as the off-season has worn on those rumblings have turned to mumbles. I think next year there has to be some signs of real tangible progress or Crean will be looking at a hot seat in 2012. But, even if the team completely tanks Crean’s amazing recruiting run has reserved his office until at least 2012.
BTP: Both Christian Watford and Jordan Hulls did a great job as sophomores to help lead a young Indiana squad. If you could only have one of them going forward, who would you pick?
CQ: This is a tough question because I believe Watford has the greater talent and upside, but Hulls has become a true leader among the program. Tom Crean just tweeted the other day about Hulls and Sheehey really being leaders in the weight room. This team could use a real injection of talent but it needs leadership more. IU lost several games this year down the final stretch because they would crumble when it mattered most. So I would choose the leadership qualities of Jordan Hulls over the greater talent of Christian Watford.
BTP: Maurice Creek fractured a kneecap for the second straight season. Can he still have a big impact on this team in the future or will he get lost behind Victor Oladipo and Will Sheehey in IU’s wing rotation?
CQ: The freak thing about Mo’s kneecap is that it wasn’t just one. It was both. Two freak injuries to two separate knees in two consecutive years. I’d imagine after having been out of competitive basketball for essentially two years he’s going to have a lot of cobwebs to shake off. That being said he is a great talent. He may get lost in the shuffle for a good portion of the upcoming season because of issues he will have to work through, but come the second half of the Big Ten season I would not be surprised to see him as the number one or two scoring threat for the Hoosiers.
BTP: How excited are you for incoming 6’11 power forward Cody Zeller? Are you expecting him to make a Sullinger-like impact on an Indiana team that was lacking in frontcourt size this season?
CQ: Personally, I am extremely happy to see him in Bloomington. I am from Southern Indiana, played against the middle Zeller in AAU basketball and watched Luke a year ahead of me in high school, while I was sitting in the stands, hit a game winning, half court, state championship shot that still gives me goose bumps when I think about it. So there is some nostalgia in a Zeller boy playing for my team. He should have a big impact on IU next year but nowhere near the kind of impact Sullinger had for Ohio State. Zeller will be a scoring threat that teams haven’t had to focus on in the past few seasons. By having to keep an eye on Zeller, teams will not be able to solely focus on the perimeter game, thus improving the rest of the team.
BTP: Both Verdell Jones and Jordan Hulls did some point guard work this season. Jones was a better assist guy but also turned the ball over much more often. Would you rather the guards’ roles be more defined next season? Which player are you more comfortable with playing the point?
CQ: Wanting and having are two different things. I would WANT the roles to be more defined but I don’t think we’re going to get it. If Verdell can discover the magic combination of limiting turnovers and still being a good distributor I would love to see him get the majority of the load at PG. He is better at attacking the perimeter and hits that 15-foot pull up jumper with deadly accuracy. Hulls is a much better catch and shoot player than he is with the dribble drive so naturally him swinging over to SG would be for the best. The guard situation is completely in the hands of Jones and whether he can find a way to stop throwing the ball to the other team.
BTP: Jeremiah Rivers is the lone graduating senior. He was a great defender on the perimeter. Is there anyone on the team right now capable of filling that role for 2011-12?
CQ: Jeremiah played his way into many starting lineups because of his lockdown perimeter defense. The player on the current roster that I could see filling that role is Victor Oladipo. He is deceptively long and is a hard worker. Rivers’ motor was what made him so good. His persistence was a nuisance to anyone he matched up against. Will Sheehey would be number two in line of possible successors to Rivers because of that same motor and drive to ruin the other guy’s night.
BTP: Tell us about the other incoming freshman, Austin Etherington. With Indiana’s deep lineup, will he give coach Crean a reason to play him right away?
CQ: AE has been THE reason that Crean has had his recruiting success. The kid is like another coach on the recruiting trail and his basketball IQ is through the roof. I truly believe that Etherington will find his way on the court in one facet or another. He could use a little more bulk which may see him spend a good portion of next year working with a nutritionist and weight coach to add some size to him, but he seems to me to be a guy that will find a role no matter the team dynamics. His basketball intelligence makes him a very versatile player defensively and very capable offensively.
BTP: OK, finally how will Indiana do in the Big Ten next season and will they qualify for the NCAA Tournament?
CQ: That is the million dollar question. If I knew I’d move to Vegas. But an educated guess tells me that if put in a vacuum (meaning barring any major injuries or NCAA ineligibility decisions) they will a 17-18 win team. I’m sure the pre-conference schedule will be a cake walk resulting in 9-10 wins and the conference schedule will see us winning more of those close games that we dropped this season. 7 or 8 wins in conference shouldn’t be too much to ask for. If Zeller and AE are more effective than I expect and we see more growth in the current players a NCAA at large bid is possible. I think the NIT is more plausible though.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
11-12 Indiana reminds me a lot of 10-11 Penn State
Everybody coming back from a team that finished last in the Big Ten, sure, but has shown flashes of promise and had a not bad at all KenPom ranking, especially considering the overall record. Throw in a prize recruit, and there is certainly reason to believe.
With Sullinger and Buford returning, I don’t see Indiana being better than Ohio State, and with everyone returning from an almost sweet 16 team, I don’t see Indiana being better than Michigan. But combine everything Indiana has going for them in what should be a very young Big Ten, and I really don’t think 3rd place is a stretch, especially seeing as how Penn State was able to finish fourth 1)in a much tougher Big Ten, 2) against the insanest Big Ten schedule possible, and 3) was one bad call on the road against Purdue from finishing all alone in 4th. And that’s Penn State, who has a little bit less in the way of homegrown talent and tradition than Indiana.
I've got the brains. You've got the looks. Let's make lots of money.
I agree
I don’t think it should be a surprise to anybody if Indiana finishes in the top half of the conference next year, in fact, it should be a surprise if they don’t. OSU and UM will probably be out ahead of them like you said, but I think they could finish ahead of everyone else. They don’t have the proven star that PSU had this year though.
Maize-Colored Glasses: Polynomial-centric B1G Recap: Part I
ha ha ha..UM in the top half of the conference.
When was the last time that happened…dont jump the bandwagon yet.
UM’s best season= 2nd round in NCAA…500 in Big ten.
MSU’s worst season under Izzo=1st round exit in NCAA and .500 record in the big ten.
MSU=4 final fours in last decade.
rest of the big ten = 3.
Stop acting as if the balance of powers has shifted dramatically and there is a tectonic shift in the basketball landscape in Michigan. As long as Coach Izzo is there he will still rule the state for recruits. JB is a good coach,, taking the teams to NCAA once in a while,,,but not final four levels..unless he finds a Magic Johnson in his backyard.
keep in mind
you’re talking about a U of M team that beat Sparty twice this past season and finished 9-9 in BT play (same as MSU). U of M could loose Morris to the NBA, but that’s it. I think you’ve got some in-state battle to look forward to. 10 years of stats mean nothing to two teams who had little to nothing to do with them.
Hoosier by birth, Boilermaker by the grace of God
by sea.of.white on Apr 8, 2011 1:37 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
UM finished in the top half of the conference this year
4th/11 is top half
I've got the brains. You've got the looks. Let's make lots of money.
11-12 Indiana doesn't have a player like Taylor Battle
I tend to disagree. I don’t see them going from 3 wins in conference to 11 or 12, which would be a guess as to what would be needed to be third in the big ten. PSU had a dominant player that other teams couldn’t stop, and he finally decided to trust his teamates, and that is why they stepped it up. IU is still young, and doesn’t have the talent of other teams in the B1G. I would look to them winning maybe 7 games in conference next year, putting them around 7th or 8th in the conference. If they still end up in the cellar, then I think the Hoosiers will be looking for a new coach.
I tend to agree with the Crimson Quarry guy, 7-8 conference wins
I think that the assumption that OSU will win the conference next year is solid, but I think the IU gets 3rd next year is a pretty big stretch. If, as everyone seems to agree, UM will be better than IU next year, then I don’t see how you figure that IU will be better than Michigan State, Wisconsin, and Purdue. I don’t think Michigan will be head and shoulders above those teams. And who knows what to expect out of Illinois, Minnesota and Nebraska next year?
If Indiana wins enough games to finish 3rd next year, how crazy are the post-game celebrations at Assembly Hall Bloomington going to get?
Manager at BT Powerhouse a Big Ten basketball blog
@babaoreally
Answer
very
-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.
- Follow me on the Twitter for worthless thoughts and IU updates.
I think it's safe to say
Indiana should take some big steps forward in 11-12. Iowa as well. With PSU and NW likely finding their way back to the bottom. On the flipside – OSU returns a squad that will at least contend for the BT title.
The rest of the Conf. seems like a big question mark. A lot of new faces in 11-12
Hoosier by birth, Boilermaker by the grace of God

by 























